Benjamin v. Casey
63 N.E. 925, 181 Mass. 542, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 918
This text of 63 N.E. 925 (Benjamin v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Benjamin v. Casey, 63 N.E. 925, 181 Mass. 542, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 918 (Mass. 1902).
Opinion
The allowance of the amendment was a matter of discretion. Nothing appears except that leave to amend was asked at the last moment and was denied. This is not ground for exception.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Successors of Martínez v. Tomás Dávila & Co.
19 P.R. 503 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1913)
Sucs. de José Martínez v. Tomás Dávila y Ca.
19 P.R. Dec. 527 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 N.E. 925, 181 Mass. 542, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-v-casey-mass-1902.