Beniko, Inc. v. United States

2007 CIT 22
United States Court of International Trade·Decided February 15, 2007·No. 04-00116·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 07-22

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : BENIKO, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : Before: MUSGRAVE, Judge v. : : Court No. 04-00116 UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : ____________________________________:

JUDGMENT

The above-captioned action was stayed pending this Court’s resolution of Cricket Hosiery,

Inc. v. United States, Court Number 03-00533. On April 24, 2006, the Court issued a final judgment

dismissing that action. See Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States, 30 CIT __, 429 F. Supp. 2d 1338

(2006). On December 8, 2006, the Court ordered that “plaintiff shall, within 30 days of the date of

this Order, show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.” To date,

plaintiff has not come forward with any reason why this action should not be dismissed. Therefore,

pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Rule 41(b)(3), it is hereby

ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

/s/ R. Kenton Musgrave R. Kenton Musgrave, Judge

Dated: February 15, 2007 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beniko, Inc. v. United States, 2007 CIT 22 (cit 2007).

2007 CIT 22 (Beniko, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States
429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (Court of International Trade, 2006)