Beniko, Inc. v. United States

31 Ct. Int'l Trade 202
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2007·No. Court No. 04-00116·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

MUSGRAVE, Judge:

The above-captioned action was stayed pending this Court’s resolution of Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States, Court Number 03-00533. On April 24, 2006, the Court issued a final judgment dismissing that action. See Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States, 30 CIT _, 429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (2006). On December 8, 2006, the Court ordered that “plaintiff shall, within 30 days of the date of this Order, show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.” To date, plaintiff has not come forward with any reason why this action should not be dismissed. Therefore, pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Rule 41(b)(3), it is hereby

ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beniko, Inc. v. United States, 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 202 (cit 2007).

31 Ct. Int'l Trade 202 (Beniko, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States
429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (Court of International Trade, 2006)