Benedict v. Podwats
271 A.2d 417, 57 N.J. 219, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 207
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny filed in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super. 402.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benedict v. Podwats, 271 A.2d 417, 57 N.J. 219, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1970).
271 A.2d 417 (Benedict v. Podwats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rowe v. Mazel Thirty, LLC
34 A.3d 1248 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Filipowicz v. Diletto
796 A.2d 296 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Bennett v. Real Property Services Corp.
66 F. Supp. 2d 607 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
Arvanitis v. Hios
705 A.2d 355 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
Cerciello v. MacConchie
660 A.2d 552 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors
625 A.2d 1110 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Berrios v. United Parcel Service
627 A.2d 701 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors
599 A.2d 924 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
Russell v. Merck & Co., Inc.
511 A.2d 1247 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Hager v. Etting
408 A.2d 856 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Orawsky v. Jersey Cent. Power and Light Co.
472 F. Supp. 881 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
Ralph D. Smith and Thelma Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., a Body Corporate
469 F.2d 97 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Peterson v. Balach
199 N.W.2d 639 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)
Benedict v. Podwats
271 A.2d 417 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)