Benedict v. Betancourt
746 A.2d 784, 252 Conn. 362, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 50
This text of 746 A.2d 784 (Benedict v. Betancourt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Benedict v. Betancourt, 746 A.2d 784, 252 Conn. 362, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 50 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
Opinion
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case [363]*363should be dismissed on the ground that certification was granted improvidently.1
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rucker v. Brown, No. Fa91 0285787 (Apr. 23, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5309 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
746 A.2d 784, 252 Conn. 362, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-betancourt-conn-2000.