Benedict v. Betancourt

734 A.2d 980, 249 Conn. 922, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 16, 1999
DocketSC 16128
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 734 A.2d 980 (Benedict v. Betancourt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benedict v. Betancourt, 734 A.2d 980, 249 Conn. 922, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 238 (Colo. 1999).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 53 Conn. App. 901 (AC 18297), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to open the judgment of paternity?”

James D. Hirschfield, in support of the petition. J. Bernard Davis, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benedict v. Betancourt
746 A.2d 784 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
734 A.2d 980, 249 Conn. 922, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-betancourt-conn-1999.