Benedict v. Betancourt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Benedict v. Betancourt

734 A.2d 980, 249 Conn. 922, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 238

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 16, 1999·No. SC 16128·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 53 Conn. App. 901 (AC 18297), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to open the judgment of paternity?”

James D. Hirschfield, in support of the petition. J. Bernard Davis, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 53 Conn. App. 901 (AC 18297), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to open the judgment of paternity?”

James D. Hirschfield, in support of the petition. J. Bernard Davis, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

Benedict v. Betancourt, 734 A.2d 980, 249 Conn. 922, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 238 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

734 A.2d 980 (Benedict v. Betancourt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related