Belmont v. Gentry

South Dakota Supreme Court

Belmont v. Gentry

252 N.W. 3, 62 S.D. 123, 1933 S.D. LEXIS 136

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 29, 1933

DocketFile No. 7626.

StatusPublished

This text of 252 N.W. 3 (Belmont v. Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belmont v. Gentry, 252 N.W. 3, 62 S.D. 123, 1933 S.D. LEXIS 136 (S.D. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs appealed from an order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In an opinion filed this day, this court has affirmed the order of the trial court involved in that appeal. See Belmont v. Gentry (No. 7604) 62 S.D. 118, 252 N.W. 1. This appeal involves a cross-appeal by the defendants, wherein they complain of the order of the trial court overruling the demurrer on the grounds that there is a defect of parties plaintiff, and that several causes of action have been improperly united.

From what was said in the opinion filed in case No. 7604, we believe it apparent that the cross-appeal is without merit, and that the order of the trial court should be, and is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs appealed from an order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In an opinion filed this day, this court has affirmed the order of the trial court involved in that appeal. See Belmont v. Gentry (No. 7604) 62 S.D. 118, 252 N.W. 1. This appeal involves a cross-appeal by the defendants, wherein they complain of the order of the trial court overruling the demurrer on the grounds that there is a defect of parties plaintiff, and that several causes of action have been improperly united.

From what was said in the opinion filed in case No. 7604, we believe it apparent that the cross-appeal is without merit, and that the order of the trial court should be, and is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 N.W. 3, 62 S.D. 123, 1933 S.D. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belmont-v-gentry-sd-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack