Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 687, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2226
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided August 2, 1926·No. Docket No. 1220.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
[688] OPINION.
: The decision in this case, in so far as it relates to the contribution to the-Chamber'of Commerce, is controlled by the opinion in the Appeal of Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124, and it is not necessary to repeat here what was said there. The contribution was not an ordinary and necessary expense of the taxpayer’s business.
Order of redetermination mil he ’ entered on 10 days’ notice, wider Rule SO.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 687, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2226 (bta 1926).
4 B.T.A. 687 (Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 687 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)