Bellaskus v. Crossman

335 U.S. 840, 69 S. Ct. 64, 93 L. Ed. 391, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 1670
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 18, 1948·No. No. 10·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General and consideration of the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order discharging the rule to show cause and dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Robert S. Erdahl.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bellaskus v. Crossman, 335 U.S. 840, 69 S. Ct. 64, 93 L. Ed. 391, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 1670 (1948).

335 U.S. 840 (Bellaskus v. Crossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Corbitt
368 F. Supp. 881 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
United States v. James Carlton
456 F.2d 207 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Cosgrove v. County of Sacramento
252 Cal. App. 2d 45 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Dickson v. United States
226 A.2d 364 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1967)
Earl R. Cephus v. United States
324 F.2d 893 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Swain v. State
156 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
United States v. Frank Costello
255 F.2d 876 (Second Circuit, 1958)
United States v. Puff
211 F.2d 171 (Second Circuit, 1954)
Battle v. United States
206 F.2d 440 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)
Casey v. United States
343 U.S. 808 (Supreme Court, 1952)
Simcic v. United States
86 A.2d 98 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1952)