Bellamy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bellamy v. State

590 So. 2d 44, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, 1991 WL 272764

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 20, 1991

DocketNo. 90-3723, 90-3701

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 590 So. 2d 44 (Bellamy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bellamy v. State, 590 So. 2d 44, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, 1991 WL 272764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Both appellants in these consolidated appeals challenge their convictions. Each also argues that the written judgment and sentence are not consistent with the trial judge’s oral pronouncements delivered at the sentencing hearing. Having concluded [45]*45that the sole argument addressed to the convictions requires neither reversal nor discussion, we affirm the convictions.

Appellants are correct, however, with regard to the written judgments and sentences. Not only do they fail accurately to reflect the trial judge’s oral sentences; they also erroneously number the counts of the amended information as to which the jury found each appellant guilty, and incorrectly identify the degree of many of the offenses. Accordingly, we remand with directions that the judgments and sentences be corrected so that they reflect accurately the trial judge’s actual rulings.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI