Bell v. State

1973 OK CR 3, 505 P.2d 526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 803
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 8, 1973·No. No. A-17894·Published

Opinion

OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Bennie Earl Bell, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered a plea of Guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, to the offense of Grand Larceny, and received a five-year suspended sentence on May 3, 1971. Said suspension was ordered revoked on March 23, 1972, and from said Order of Revocation, a post conviction appeal has been perfected to this Court.

Evidence at the revocation hearing reflected that defendant was convicted in the District Court o-f Oklahoma County for the offense of Burglary in the Second Degree on February 16, 1972. Defendant’s attorney candidly admits that “[b]y reason of the holding in Brooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 484 P.2d 1333, the revocation would seem to be well within the lower court’s discretion.”

The Order revoking defendant’s suspended sentence in Case No. CRF-70-3767 is accordingly affirmed.

BLISS and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 1973 OK CR 3, 505 P.2d 526 (Okla. Ct. App. 1973).

1973 OK CR 3 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
1971 OK CR 199 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1971)