Bell v. State
This text of 1973 OK CR 3 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant, Bennie Earl Bell, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered a plea of Guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, to the offense of Grand Larceny, and received a five-year suspended sentence on May 3, 1971. Said suspension was ordered revoked on March 23, 1972, and from said Order of Revocation, a post conviction appeal has been perfected to this Court.
Evidence at the revocation hearing reflected that defendant was convicted in the District Court o-f Oklahoma County for the offense of Burglary in the Second Degree on February 16, 1972. Defendant’s attorney candidly admits that “[b]y reason of the holding in Brooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 484 P.2d 1333, the revocation would seem to be well within the lower court’s discretion.”
The Order revoking defendant’s suspended sentence in Case No. CRF-70-3767 is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1973 OK CR 3, 505 P.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1973.