Bell v. State

240 S.W.3d 738, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604, 2007 WL 4105966
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 728
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2007·No. ED 88933·Published

Opinion

*739 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Bell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on five of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 240 S.W.3d 738, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604, 2007 WL 4105966 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

240 S.W.3d 738 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.