Bell v. State
This text of 213 S.W.3d 729 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Ronald Bell appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.085 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bell sought to vacate his convictions for assault in the first degree, section 565.050, RSMo 2000, robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and concurrent sentences of life imprisonment, twenty-five years imprisonment, and ten years imprisonment, respectively. He *730 claims on appeal that he was abandoned by postconviction counsel where counsel filed a “stand on” motion instead of an amended motion despite the fact that the only claim raised in his pro se motion was not cognizable. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 S.W.3d 729, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 212, 2007 WL 445354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-moctapp-2007.