Bell v. State
865 So. 2d 632, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310, 2004 WL 241457
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 795 So. 2d 1140 →
Opinion
Michael Bell challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the denial of his motion without prejudice to any right Bell may have to seek relief in the [633]*633trial court by means of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999); Johnson v. State, 862 So.2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 865 So. 2d 632, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310, 2004 WL 241457 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
865 So. 2d 632 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Johnson v. State
862 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)