Bell v. State

851 So. 2d 253, 2003 WL 21749505
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 2003·No. 3D02-3244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

851 So.2d 253 (2003)

James Edward BELL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D02-3244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 30, 2003.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's revocation of probation and the sentence imposed upon James Edward Bell for violating his probation. However, we remand the cause for entry of a written order providing the specific reasons for concluding Bell violated his probation, as both the State and the Public Defender agree that no such written order appears in the record. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed, but remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 851 So. 2d 253, 2003 WL 21749505 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

851 So. 2d 253 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shuler v. State
7 So. 3d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)