Bell v. State
112 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 658
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 150 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of forgery. We have read this record, and, finding no prejudicial error, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 112 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 658 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
112 So. 919 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.