Bell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Bell v. State

109 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 660

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 1926

Docket8 Div. 409.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 So. 923 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 109 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 660 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

By a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment the defendant was convicted and duly sentenced. The indictment contained two counts, distilling prohibited liquors, and possessing a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. The evidence was in conflict. It was amply sufficient to warrant the jury in returning a verdict of conviction, and to sustain the judgment pronounced and entered. The evidence also tended to show the flight of defendant; this, with his explanations and denials, were questions of fact for the jury. It so clearly appears that there was no error in any of the rulings of the court upon the trial of this case we refrain from a discussion of the points involved upon this appeal. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

By a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment the defendant was convicted and duly sentenced. The indictment contained two counts, distilling prohibited liquors, and possessing a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. The evidence was in conflict. It was amply sufficient to warrant the jury in returning a verdict of conviction, and to sustain the judgment pronounced and entered. The evidence also tended to show the flight of defendant; this, with his explanations and denials, were questions of fact for the jury. It so clearly appears that there was no error in any of the rulings of the court upon the trial of this case we refrain from a discussion of the points involved upon this appeal. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack