Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Bell v. Samaritano

Bell v. Samaritano

400 S.E.2d 13, 260 Ga. 768
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 1, 1991
DocketS90G1537
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 400 S.E.2d 13 (Bell v. Samaritano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Samaritano, 400 S.E.2d 13, 260 Ga. 768 (Ga. 1991).

Opinions

Per curiam.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, P. J., and Benham, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Myrick
422 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Von Hoff v. Carmichael
420 S.E.2d 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 S.E.2d 13, 260 Ga. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-samaritano-ga-1991.