Bell v. Gray

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 26, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-01588·Unknown

Opinion

SUONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : RENZER BELL, : : Plaintiff, : : 20 Civ. 1588 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER CHARLES GRAY, : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge:

On January 26, 2021, the Court directed the U.S. Marshals’ Service to effect personal service on Defendant Charles Gray at an address in California that was provided by Plaintiff Renzer Bell when he commenced this action. On February 17, 2021, a service receipt was docketed with the Court, reflecting that the summons was returned unexecuted because Defendant could not be located at that address. (Dkt. 38). On February 23, 2021, Plaintiff filed a supplemental affidavit in response to the Court’s Order dated January 26, 2021, directing him to provide any further information as to Defendant’s current residence. (Dkts. 37, 39). In that letter, Plaintiff advised the Court that he received new information as to Defendant’s service address and provided an address for Defendant at Yonkers KIA, 1850 Central Park Avenue, Yonkers, New York, 10710. (Dkt. 39). Given Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (Dkt. 3), the Court will issue an order directing a final attempt at service on Defendant at the new address. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue an amended summons for Defendant and deliver to the U.S. Marshals’ Service all the paperwork necessary for the U.S. Marshals’ Service to effect personal service on Defendant Charles Gray at “Yonkers KIA, 1850 Central Park Avenue, Yonkers, New York, 10710.” A copy of this Order and the Court’s Orders on Docket Numbers 36, 37, and 39 should be included in the paperwork that will be delivered to Defendant at the time of service. CONCLUSION The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to issue an amended summons for Defendant Charles Gray, complete a USM-285 form with the new service address for Defendant, “Yonkers KIA, 1850 Central Park Avenue, Yonkers, New York, 10710,” and deliver all documents necessary to effect personal service on Defendant to the U.S. Marshals’ Service. A copy of this Order and the Court’s Orders on Docket Numbers 36, 37, and 39 should be delivered to Defendant at the time of personal service. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2021 V2. New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Gray, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Bell v. Gray (Bell v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)