Bell v. Franis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2009·No. 09-7728·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7728

RICHARD W. BELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANIS, Sheriff; COVENANT, Captain; SERGEANT DOLE; VANCE, Sheriff Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00650-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard W. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard W. Bell appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Bell v. Franis, No. 1:09-cv-00650-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va.

Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Franis, (4th Cir. 2009).

Bell v. Franis (Bell v. Franis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related