Bell v. Franis

Fourth Circuit

Bell v. Franis

357 F. App'x 522

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2009·No. No. 09-7728·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard W. Bell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. Franis, No. 1:09-cv-00650-JCC-IDD, 2009 WL 2877079 (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [523]*523the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard W. Bell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. Franis, No. 1:09-cv-00650-JCC-IDD, 2009 WL 2877079 (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [523]*523the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bell v. Franis, 357 F. App'x 522 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

357 F. App'x 522 (Bell v. Franis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related