Bell v. Destin Towers Condominium Owners Ass'n

704 So. 2d 1145, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 684, 1998 WL 31455
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 1998
DocketNos. 96-4982, 97-429
StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 1145 (Bell v. Destin Towers Condominium Owners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Destin Towers Condominium Owners Ass'n, 704 So. 2d 1145, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 684, 1998 WL 31455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court previously dismissed a portion of this appeal, citing City of Haines City v. Allen, 509 So.2d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), in effect ruling that appellants’ counterclaim was compulsory. For that reason, the award of attorneys’ fees, which is the subject of the remaining orders on appeal in these consolidated cases, was premature. Therefore, we VACATE those two orders, and REMAND with instructions to withhold entry of the orders until the litigation has been fully resolved. See Martinez v. Marin, 700 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Haines City v. Allen
509 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Martinez v. Marin
700 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 So. 2d 1145, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 684, 1998 WL 31455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-destin-towers-condominium-owners-assn-fladistctapp-1998.