Bell v. Brown
This text of 128 F.2d 317 (Bell v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence in this case, as we read the record, preponderates strongly against appellant. Nevertheless, we are satisfied that there was enough to require that the case go to the jury; under the well-established rule that if there is evidence upon which, when construed most favorably to the person upon whom the onus of proof is imposed, reasonable and fair-minded men, properly instructed as to the law, could find a verdict in his favor, then the question is not one of law but of fact to be settled by the jury.1
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 F.2d 317, 76 U.S. App. D.C. 5, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-brown-cadc-1942.