Bell v. Bloch

Sixth Circuit

Bell v. Bloch

152 F.2d 962, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 1946

DocketNo. 10104

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 F.2d 962 (Bell v. Bloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Bloch, 152 F.2d 962, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee brought suit against appellants for overtime work under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury and ap-pellee recovered a judgment for $596.16 with interest at 6% per annum from April 12, 1945, until paid, and for the further sum of $596.16 as liquidated damages with interest at 6% per annum from April 12, 1945, until paid, together with costs.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by the District Judge on April 16, 1945, except in one particular. The judgment was erroneous in so far as it allowed a recovery of interest upon the item of unliquidated damages. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co. v. Pedersen, 324 U.S. 720, 65 S.Ct. 892.

The case will be remanded to the District Court for correction of the judgment as herein indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee brought suit against appellants for overtime work under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury and ap-pellee recovered a judgment for $596.16 with interest at 6% per annum from April 12, 1945, until paid, and for the further sum of $596.16 as liquidated damages with interest at 6% per annum from April 12, 1945, until paid, together with costs.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by the District Judge on April 16, 1945, except in one particular. The judgment was erroneous in so far as it allowed a recovery of interest upon the item of unliquidated damages. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co. v. Pedersen, 324 U.S. 720, 65 S.Ct. 892.

The case will be remanded to the District Court for correction of the judgment as herein indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 F.2d 962, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-bloch-ca6-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack