Bell-Boston v. Mazza Gallerie Mall

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: January 27, 2009
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2009-0149
• Status: Published

Opinion

--------------------,--,-- --

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAN 272009 Kareemah Bell-Boston, ) Clerk, U.S. District and ) Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. OD U149 ) Mazza Gallerie Mall, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed

in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least

plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to

plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff, a resident of Landover Hills, Maryland, sues the Mazza Gallerie Mall in

Washington, D.C. for an alleged encounter on December 17,2008, with a security officer "about

destruction of mall furniture," who also allegedly told plaintiff "to clean up my mess, [that] he

had a personal problem with me being inside the mall and [that] he wanted me to leave

immediately." Compi. at 2. The complaint does not allege a violation of either the Constitution

or federal law nor does it provide a basis for diversity jurisdiction inasmuch as plaintiff has not demanded any amount of monetary damages. Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed. A

separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

~ Date: January r, 2009