Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

211 F.3d 853
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2000·No. 99-2389, 992391·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Plaintiffs-appellees filed a petition for an initial hearing en banc. A member of the court requested a poll on whether this case should be heard initially en banc. A majority of the judges in active service voted that it should not be heard initially en banc.

Chief Judge Wilkinson and Judges Widener, Murnaghan, Niemeyer, Michael, Motz, Traxler, and King voted to deny initial en banc hearing. Judges Wilkins, Luttig, and Williams voted to grant initial en banc hearing.

Chief Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion concurring in the denial of an initial hearing en banc. Judge Luttig filed an opinion dissenting from denial of hearing en banc. The petition for initial hearing en banc is hereby denied. Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkinson for the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 211 F.3d 853 (4th Cir. 2000).

211 F.3d 853 (Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramirez v. Department of Justice
680 F. Supp. 2d 208 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board Of Education
211 F.3d 853 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)