Belford v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JAN-2025 12:47 PM Dkt. 3 ODSAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
CHEYENNE BELFORD, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1CC171001287)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
On January 15, 2025, the Intermediate Court of Appeals
filed its judgment on appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX. Yet despite
Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40.1(a)’s clear
directive, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant filed an application
for writ of certiorari on January 13, 2025.
It is hereby ordered that Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s
application for writ of certiorari, filed January 13, 2025, is
dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2020) (“The application shall be
filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate
court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless
the time for filing the application is extended in accordance
with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, January 16, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Belford v. State (Belford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.