Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.

256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 1084 (Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co., 256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

In separate actions brought by an infant for damages for personal injuries, and by his father for loss of services and medical expenses, judgments of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the plaintiffs reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. On a former appeal we reversed judgments in the plaintiffs’ favor as against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. (255 App. Div. 705.) The present judgments are erroneous and reversible for the same reason. In fact, the defendant made out a stronger case upon the second trial because of the additional evidence of the witness Eva Chamberlain. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In separate actions brought by an infant for damages for personal injuries, and by his father for loss of services and medical expenses, judgments of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the plaintiffs reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. On a former appeal we reversed judgments in the plaintiffs’ favor as against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. (255 App. Div. 705.) The present judgments are erroneous and reversible for the same reason. In fact, the defendant made out a stronger case upon the second trial because of the additional evidence of the witness Eva Chamberlain. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1084, 12 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belfi-v-yonkers-national-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1939.