Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.

255 A.D. 705, 6 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 705 (Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belfi v. Yonkers National Bank & Trust Co., 255 A.D. 705, 6 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Separate appeals by the defendant in each of two actions tried together, one by an infant for damages for personal injuries and the other by Ms father for medical expenses and loss of the infant’s services, (a) from judgments for the plaintiffs respectively, entered on jury verdicts in the City Court of Yonkers, and (b) from orders denying defendant’s motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial in each case. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts in each case, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The verdicts were against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Separate appeals by the defendant in each of two actions tried together, one by an infant for damages for personal injuries and the other by Ms father for medical expenses and loss of the infant’s services, (a) from judgments for the plaintiffs respectively, entered on jury verdicts in the City Court of Yonkers, and (b) from orders denying defendant’s motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial in each case. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts in each case, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The verdicts were against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 705, 6 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belfi-v-yonkers-national-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1938.