Belesi v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Belesi v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

272 A.D.2d 353, 707 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 353 (Belesi v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belesi v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance, 272 A.D.2d 353, 707 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover the proceeds of a disability insurance policy, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered October 15, 1997, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his third and fourth causes of action and denied its cross motion for leave to amend its answer to include a counterclaim for rescission and for summary judgment on the counterclaim, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered March 24,1998, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $254,198, and directed it to pay the plaintiff continuing disability benefits.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in Belesi v Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. (272 AD2d 353 [decided herewith]). Santucci, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover the proceeds of a disability insurance policy, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered October 15, 1997, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his third and fourth causes of action and denied its cross motion for leave to amend its answer to include a counterclaim for rescission and for summary judgment on the counterclaim, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered March 24,1998, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $254,198, and directed it to pay the plaintiff continuing disability benefits.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in Belesi v Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. (272 AD2d 353 [decided herewith]). Santucci, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 353, 707 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belesi-v-connecticut-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack