Home/New York Court of Appeals/Bekermus v. Allen

Bekermus v. Allen

440 N.E.2d 795, 57 N.Y.2d 723, 454 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3646
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 8, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 440 N.E.2d 795 (Bekermus v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bekermus v. Allen, 440 N.E.2d 795, 57 N.Y.2d 723, 454 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3646 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

[724]*724Motion for leave to appeal, made on behalf of defendants Sanford Nalitt and Chatham Realty Corp., and on behalf of defendant Allen’s Acres, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754; CPLR 5611). Motion for leave to appeal, made on behalf of defendant Rosalie Allen, dismissed upon the ground that that defendant is not a party aggrieved by the order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5511). Twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 N.E.2d 795, 57 N.Y.2d 723, 454 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bekermus-v-allen-ny-1982.