Beijing CRS Metallurgical Machinery Co. Ltd v. Orient Commercial Joint Stock Bank

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 16, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-05617·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: nnn nnn nasa aa anna IK DATE FILED:_09/16/2025 BEIJING CRS METALLURGICAL MACHINERY CO. : LTD, : Plaintiff, : 25-cv-5617 (LJL) -V- : ORDER ORIENT COMMERCIAL JOINT STOCK BANK, : Defendant. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On August 7, 2025, the Court directed Respondent to file its opposition to the petition to confirm no later than September 8, 2025. Dkt. No.5. Respondent filed a document on that date, thereby apparently appearing in this case. However, there is no indication that it was filed by counsel admitted to the bar of this Court. Respondent is advised that a corporation may be heard in this court only through counsel admitted to the bar of this Court (or admitted pro hac vice). See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); Chao v. Russell P. Le Frois Builder, Inc., 291 F.3d 219, 225 n.7 (2d Cir. 2002). Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent and shall file proof of service on the docket. The time for Respondent to respond is extended nunc pro tunc to October 6, 2025.

SO ORDERED. ye ye Pa Dated: September 16, 2025 New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beijing CRS Metallurgical Machinery Co. Ltd v. Orient Commercial Joint Stock Bank, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Beijing CRS Metallurgical Machinery Co. Ltd v. Orient Commercial Joint Stock Bank (Beijing CRS Metallurgical Machinery Co. Ltd v. Orient Commercial Joint Stock Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related