Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC

Ninth Circuit

Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC

661 F.3d 1199, 2011 WL 5143063

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 741 F.3d 29 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2011·No. Nos. 07-56692, 07-56693·Published

Opinion

[1201] ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Within seven days from the date of this order, the parties shall forward to the Clerk of Court twenty-five additional paper copies of the original briefs and excerpts of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1201] ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Within seven days from the date of this order, the parties shall forward to the Clerk of Court twenty-five additional paper copies of the original briefs and excerpts of record.

Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC, 661 F.3d 1199, 2011 WL 5143063 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

661 F.3d 1199 (Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.