Beecham v. Burns

California Court of Appeal

Beecham v. Burns

34 Cal. App. 804

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 4, 1917

DocketCiv. No. 2388

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cal. App. 804 (Beecham v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beecham v. Burns, 34 Cal. App. 804 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 Pac. 1058], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 Pac. 1058], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cal. App. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beecham-v-burns-calctapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack