Becket v. Coe

98 F.2d 332, 69 App. D.C. 51, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 6, 1938·No. 6790·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in this cause is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Mr. Justice VAN ORSDEL sat during the argument of this case but died August 7, 1937.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Becket v. Coe, 98 F.2d 332, 69 App. D.C. 51, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213 (D.C. Cir. 1938).

98 F.2d 332 (Becket v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Malagari
499 F.2d 1297 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1974)
Johnsen v. Brenner
294 F. Supp. 60 (District of Columbia, 1968)
Phillips Petroleum Company v. Ladd
219 F. Supp. 366 (District of Columbia, 1963)
Application of George E. Linnert and Ronald H. Espy
309 F.2d 498 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1962)
Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Link Aviation, Inc.
182 F. Supp. 106 (N.D. New York, 1959)
Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.
161 F. Supp. 437 (S.D. California, 1958)
Pattinson v. Watson
148 F. Supp. 951 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson
147 F. Supp. 915 (District of Columbia, 1956)
Application of Tanczyn
202 F.2d 785 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. Marzall
103 F. Supp. 564 (District of Columbia, 1952)
Switzer v. Marzall
94 F. Supp. 52 (District of Columbia, 1950)
Burgess Battery Co. v. United States
55 F. Supp. 603 (Court of Claims, 1944)
In Re Cooper
134 F.2d 630 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1943)
Baldwin-Southwark Corp. v. Coe
133 F.2d 359 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Nye v. Coe
44 F. Supp. 582 (District of Columbia, 1942)
Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.
124 F.2d 986 (Second Circuit, 1942)
Murphy v. Coe
99 F.2d 994 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Kelley v. Coe
99 F.2d 435 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)