Becket v. Coe
98 F.2d 332, 69 App. D.C. 51, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1938
Docket6790
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases
This text of 98 F.2d 332 (Becket v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Becket v. Coe, 98 F.2d 332, 69 App. D.C. 51, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213 (D.C. Cir. 1938).
Opinions
The decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in this cause is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Mr. Justice VAN ORSDEL sat during the argument of this case but died August 7, 1937.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Malagari
499 F.2d 1297 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1974)
Johnsen v. Brenner
294 F. Supp. 60 (District of Columbia, 1968)
Filmon Process Corporation v. Spell-Right Corporation
404 F.2d 1351 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents
356 F.2d 813 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
Phillips Petroleum Company v. Ladd
219 F. Supp. 366 (District of Columbia, 1963)
Application of George E. Linnert and Ronald H. Espy
309 F.2d 498 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1962)
Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Link Aviation, Inc.
182 F. Supp. 106 (N.D. New York, 1959)
Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.
161 F. Supp. 437 (S.D. California, 1958)
Pattinson v. Watson
148 F. Supp. 951 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson
147 F. Supp. 915 (District of Columbia, 1956)
Application of Tanczyn
202 F.2d 785 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. Marzall
103 F. Supp. 564 (District of Columbia, 1952)
Switzer v. Marzall
94 F. Supp. 52 (District of Columbia, 1950)
Burgess Battery Co. v. United States
55 F. Supp. 603 (Court of Claims, 1944)
In Re Cooper
134 F.2d 630 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1943)
Baldwin-Southwark Corp. v. Coe
133 F.2d 359 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Nye v. Coe
44 F. Supp. 582 (District of Columbia, 1942)
Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.
124 F.2d 986 (Second Circuit, 1942)
Murphy v. Coe
99 F.2d 994 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Kelley v. Coe
99 F.2d 435 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
98 F.2d 332, 69 App. D.C. 51, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becket-v-coe-cadc-1938.