Home/California Court of Appeal/Beazell v. Schrader

Beazell v. Schrader

205 Cal. App. 673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beazell v. Schrader. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 Cal. App. 2d 673 →
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 16, 1962·No. Civ. No. 26165·Published

Opinion

BURKE, P. J.

Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer to a first amended complaint.

On November 3, 1961, a minute order was entered sustaining defendant’s demurrer to first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the superior court. No judgment thereon has been entered.

[674]*674[ 1 ] It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, 187 Cal.App.2d 44 [9 Cal.Rptr. 299]; Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296, 298 [308 P.2d 405]; Schmidt v. Townsend, 103 Cal.App.2d 185, 186-187 [229 P.2d 488]; see also 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 19, p. 2162.)

The purported appeal is dismissed.

J efferson, J., and Balthis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beazell v. Schrader, 205 Cal. App. 673 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962).

205 Cal. App. 673 (Beazell v. Schrader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Townsend
229 P.2d 488 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
308 P.2d 405 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines
187 Cal. App. 2d 44 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines
187 Cal. App. 2d 44 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)