Beazell v. Schrader
This text of 205 Cal. App. 673 (Beazell v. Schrader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer to a first amended complaint.
On November 3, 1961, a minute order was entered sustaining defendant’s demurrer to first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the superior court. No judgment thereon has been entered.
[674]*674[ 1 ] It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, 187 Cal.App.2d 44 [9 Cal.Rptr. 299]; Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296, 298 [308 P.2d 405]; Schmidt v. Townsend, 103 Cal.App.2d 185, 186-187 [229 P.2d 488]; see also 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 19, p. 2162.)
The purported appeal is dismissed.
J efferson, J., and Balthis, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 Cal. App. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beazell-v-schrader-calctapp-1962.