Beaver v. Frick Co.

13 S.W. 134, 53 Ark. 18, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 8, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 S.W. 134 (Beaver v. Frick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beaver v. Frick Co., 13 S.W. 134, 53 Ark. 18, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 23 (Ark. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The mortgagor resided in the western district of Carroll county. The court found that the plaintiff’s mortgage was never recorded or filed in that district. It was therefore not a lien on the property of the mortgagor as against a subsequent mortgage filed and recorded in the district where the mortgagor resides. Under the act creating separate districts for the record of deeds and mortgages in Carroll county (Act March 12, 1883), the two districts stand in that respect as separate counties. Delivery of a deed in one district to the clerk or his deputy without instructions is prima facie delivery to be filed in the district where delivered.

Reverse and remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Cartwright
20 S.W.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)
Simpson v. First National Bank of Dewitt
292 S.W. 138 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)
In re T. H. Bunch Commission Co.
225 F. 243 (E.D. Arkansas, 1915)
Bunch v. Potts
21 S.W. 437 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.W. 134, 53 Ark. 18, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaver-v-frick-co-ark-1890.