Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.

111 A.D.3d 524, 975 N.Y.S.2d 333

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.3d 524 (Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp., 111 A.D.3d 524, 975 N.Y.S.2d 333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered April 26, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations for her medical, employment and insurance records, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having defaulted in this action, defendant is not entitled to pursue discovery in preparation for the inquest (Servais v Silk Nail Corp., 96 AD3d 546, 547 [1st Dept 2012]; Law Firm of Ravi Batra, P.C. v Rabinowich, 77 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2010]; Gray v Jaeger, 57 AD3d 303 [1st Dept 2008]; Yeboah v Gaines Serv. Leasing, 250 AD2d 453 [1st Dept 1998]).

We decline defendant’s request to grant leave to the Court of Appeals. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered April 26, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations for her medical, employment and insurance records, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having defaulted in this action, defendant is not entitled to pursue discovery in preparation for the inquest (Servais v Silk Nail Corp., 96 AD3d 546, 547 [1st Dept 2012]; Law Firm of Ravi Batra, P.C. v Rabinowich, 77 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2010]; Gray v Jaeger, 57 AD3d 303 [1st Dept 2008]; Yeboah v Gaines Serv. Leasing, 250 AD2d 453 [1st Dept 1998]).

We decline defendant’s request to grant leave to the Court of Appeals. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.3d 524, 975 N.Y.S.2d 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaulieu-v-jay-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack