Gray v. Jaeger
57 A.D.3d 303, 868 N.Y.2d 521
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2008·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
[304] On a prior appeal (17 AD3d 286 [2005]), this Court struck defendants’ answer. As a result, they are now foreclosed from pursuing discovery in preparation for the inquest (see Hall v Penas, 5 AD3d 549 [2004]), including a physical examination of plaintiff. Concur—Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. Jaeger, 57 A.D.3d 303, 868 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 303 (Gray v. Jaeger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
1591 Second Ave. LLC v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.
2023 NY Slip Op 04916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.
111 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Servais v. Silk Nail Corp.
96 A.D.3d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)