Beasley v. Western Union Tel. Co.

39 F. 181, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2268
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas
DecidedMay 29, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 39 F. 181 (Beasley v. Western Union Tel. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. Western Union Tel. Co., 39 F. 181, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2268 (circtwdtex 1889).

Opinion

Maxey, J.,

(charging jury.) The plaintiff, Robert Beasley, brings this suit to recover damages of the defendant for the failure to deliver a telegram to him at Wallis, a station on the San Antonio & Arkansas Pass Railway. The message, alleged in the petition to have been delivered by Miss Annie Melas, as agent of plaintiff, to the defendant’s operator at San Antonio for transmission, is set out as follows:

“San Antonio, Texas, January II, 1888.
“To Robert Beasley, News Agent, 8. A. & A. P. Ry. train, Wallis, Texas: “Dell is worse, come at once.
[Signed] “Sister Annie.”

The telegram has reference to the wife of plaintiff, who (the wife) was then in a critical condition, and who died on the morning of the 11th, and, as stated by Miss Melas, between the hours of 11 and 12 o’clock. Referring to that telegram, it is alleged by the plaintiff “that said message was written by said Annie Melas upon a half sheet of common commercial note paper, and when the same was delivered, as aforesaid, to the agent of defendant, he, the said agent, of his own volition, and without the request of the said Annie Melas, copied, or rewrote, said message upon one of the telegraphic blanks of said defendant.” It is insisted, on the contrary, by the defendant that Miss Melas herself wrote the body of the message, including the signature, and that at her request the agent of defendant, Towhey, merely inserted the address, and that Miss Melas so wrote the message on one of the printed forms or blanks which are in general use by the defendant company; the same being as follows:

Form No. 46.
THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
NIGHT MESSAGE.
The business of telegraphing is subject to errors and delays, arising froln causes which cannot at all times be guarded against, including sometimes negligence of serv[183]*183ants and agents whom it is necessary to employ. Errors and delays may be prevented by repetition for which, during the day, half price extra is charged in addition to the full tariff rates.
The Western Union Telegraph Company will receive messages, to be sent without repetition during the night, for delivery not earlier than the morning of the next ensuing business day at reduced rates, but in no case for less than twenty-five cents tolls for a single message, and upon the express condition that the sender will agree that he will not claim damages for errors or delays or for non-delivery of such messages, happening from any cause, beyond a sum equal to ten times the amount paid for transmission; and that no claim for damages shall be valid unless presented in Writing within thirty days after sending the message.
Messages will be delivered free within the established free delivery limits of the terminal office. Eor delivery at a greater distance a special charge will be made to cover the cost of such delivery, the sender hereby guaranteeing payment thereof.
The Company will be responsible to the limit of its lines only, for messages destined beyond, but will act as the sender’s agent, to deliver the message to connecting companies or carriers, if desired, without charge and without liability.
Tnos. T. Eckert, General Manager. Norvin Gkebn, President.
nxEaG0bn4r2e6VD8

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siats v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
88 N.W.2d 199 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Burroughs v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
165 N.W. 707 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)
O'Neill & Gyles v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
201 Ill. App. 37 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1915)
Taylor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
168 S.W. 895 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Moss & Co.
63 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Carland v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
43 L.R.A. 280 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Gahan v. Western Union Tel. Co.
59 F. 433 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F. 181, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-western-union-tel-co-circtwdtex-1889.