Beasley v. State
553 So. 2d 238, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2705, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6487, 1989 WL 139495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beasley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 751 →
Opinion
As the prosecutor’s closing argument was within the latitude allowed by State v. Sheperd, 479 So.2d 106 (Fla.1985), the defendant’s objections and motion for mistrial were properly denied.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beasley v. State, 553 So. 2d 238, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2705, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6487, 1989 WL 139495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
553 So. 2d 238 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sheperd
479 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)