Beasley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beasley v. State

555 So. 2d 382, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2581, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6162, 1989 WL 133263

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 1989·No. No. 87-3033·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual battery, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery. We conclude that the evidence of other similar acts was properly admitted. § 90.404(2)(a), Fla.Stat.(1987); Bryan v. State, 533 So.2d 744 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1765, 104 L.Ed.2d 200 (1989); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). No reversible error is shown in defendant’s second point on appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual battery, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery. We conclude that the evidence of other similar acts was properly admitted. § 90.404(2)(a), Fla.Stat.(1987); Bryan v. State, 533 So.2d 744 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1765, 104 L.Ed.2d 200 (1989); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). No reversible error is shown in defendant’s second point on appeal.

Affirmed.

Beasley v. State, 555 So. 2d 382, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2581, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6162, 1989 WL 133263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

555 So. 2d 382 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related