Bearden v. State

89 S.W.2d 1004, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 778
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1936
DocketNo. 17835
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.W.2d 1004 (Bearden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bearden v. State, 89 S.W.2d 1004, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 778 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which this prosecution was conducted has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 666 — 49) and no saving clause appears in the repealing statute taking care of pending prosecutions. We have no alternative except to obey the mandate of our statute, and the judgment will be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed following Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion handed down November 27, 1935.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.W.2d 1004, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bearden-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.