Bearden v. State

102 S.W.2d 204, 132 Tex. Crim. 39, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 24, 1937·No. No. 18837·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for violating the liquor law; punishment, a fine of $100.00.

Appellant was convicted for transporting beer in Motley County, it being simply alleged in the first count of the information “The transportation of such liquor in said county having been theretofore and was then prohibited in said county by the laws of said State.” The information is bad. See Whitmire v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 742. The information should have set out all of the facts accompanying and showing that in fact a local option election had been held in Motley County under an order of the commissioners’ court, and in accordance with law; showing the result; showing that the votes had been canvassed; that the order had been published, etc., etc., as set out in Whitmire v. State, supra. There being no valid information, there could be no legal conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bearden v. State, 102 S.W.2d 204, 132 Tex. Crim. 39, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 98 (Tex. 1937).

102 S.W.2d 204 (Bearden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frost v. State
369 S.W.2d 357 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Jackson v. State
111 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Bairrington v. State
104 S.W.2d 861 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)