Bean v. Home Detective Co.

173 S.E. 5, 206 N.C. 125, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 1934·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The allegations of the complaint are discreditable to both parties. They blacken the character of the plaintiff as well as soil the reputation of the defendant. As between them, the law refuses to lend a helping hand. The policy of the civil courts is not to paddle in muddy water, but to remit the parties, when in pari delicto, to their own folly. So, in the instant case, the plaintiff must fail in his suit. Miller v. Howell, 184 N. C., 119, 113 S. E., 621.

“It is very generally held — universally, so far as we are aware — that an action never lies when a plaintiff must base his claim, in whole or in part, on a violation by himself of the criminal or penal laws of the State” — Hoke, J., in Lloyd v. R. R., 151 N. C., 536, 66 S. E., 604.

The decisions of other jurisdictions, cited and relied upon by plaintiff, are easily distinguishable, and are not controlling on the allegations of the present complaint. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bean v. Home Detective Co., 173 S.E. 5, 206 N.C. 125, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1934).

173 S.E. 5 (Bean v. Home Detective Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zloop, Inc. v. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP
2018 NCBC 16 (North Carolina Business Court, 2018)
Freedman v. Payne
784 S.E.2d 644 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
Bondi v. Bank of America Corp.
383 F. Supp. 2d 587 (S.D. New York, 2005)
In Re Parmalat
383 F. Supp. 2d 587 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Gill
237 S.E.2d 21 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1977)
True v. Older
34 N.W.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1948)
Bledsoe v. . Lumber Co.
48 S.E.2d 50 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Bledsoe v. Coxe Lumber Co.
229 N.C. 128 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Wheeler v. Bank of Edenton
183 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Reynolds v. . Reynolds.
181 S.E. 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)