Beall v. Beall

7 Gill 233
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Spence, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

In this case, it is the opinion of this court, that the county court properly refused to give the instruction asked by the plaintiffs’ prayer, inasmuch as it omitted several material facts, of which testimony had been offered, and which were essential to raise the question on which, by the prayer, the decision of the court was invoked.

We therefore affirm the judgment; but as it does not appear to this court, that the substantia,! merits of this case are determined b.y the judgment, the clerk of this court is directed, under the provision of the act of 1830, ch. 186, to return the transcript of the record to the clerk of Allegany county court, with a writ of procedendo.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED AND CAUSE REMANDED, WITH PROCEDENDO UNDER THE ACT OF 1830, CH. 18.6,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beall v. Beall, 7 Gill 233 (Md. 1848).

7 Gill 233 (Beall v. Beall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maryland Casualty Co. v. West Construction Co.
114 A. 890 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1921)
Archer v. State
22 A. 737 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1891)
President of the Farmers Bank v. Bowie
4 Md. 290 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1853)