Beall v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Beall v. Beall

7 Gill 233

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 15, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 Gill 233 (Beall v. Beall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beall v. Beall, 7 Gill 233 (Md. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Spence, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

In this case, it is the opinion of this court, that the county court properly refused to give the instruction asked by the plaintiffs’ prayer, inasmuch as it omitted several material facts, of which testimony had been offered, and which were essential to raise the question on which, by the prayer, the decision of the court was invoked.

We therefore affirm the judgment; but as it does not appear to this court, that the substantia,! merits of this case are determined b.y the judgment, the clerk of this court is directed, under the provision of the act of 1830, ch. 186, to return the transcript of the record to the clerk of Allegany county court, with a writ of procedendo.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED AND CAUSE REMANDED, WITH PROCEDENDO UNDER THE ACT OF 1830, CH. 18.6,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spence, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

In this case, it is the opinion of this court, that the county court properly refused to give the instruction asked by the plaintiffs’ prayer, inasmuch as it omitted several material facts, of which testimony had been offered, and which were essential to raise the question on which, by the prayer, the decision of the court was invoked.

We therefore affirm the judgment; but as it does not appear to this court, that the substantia,! merits of this case are determined b.y the judgment, the clerk of this court is directed, under the provision of the act of 1830, ch. 186, to return the transcript of the record to the clerk of Allegany county court, with a writ of procedendo.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED AND CAUSE REMANDED, WITH PROCEDENDO UNDER THE ACT OF 1830, CH. 18.6,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Gill 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beall-v-beall-md-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack