Beale v. Wilson

4 Munf. 380, 18 Va. 380, 1815 Va. LEXIS 19
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 20, 1815·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

The president pronounced the courts opinion.

The court is of opinion, that, under the authority of the case of Bartley & Ferguson v. Yates, (2 H. & M. 398,) and on general principles, the bond in the record is a sufficient bond under the act of assembly. /The judgment of the District Court is therefore reversed ; but there being no bill of exceptions making the notice, stated in the record, a part thereof; and it not appearing by the judgment of the District Court, that the appellees had notice of the motion, or appeared in the court below, the cause is to be sent back to the Superior Court of Monroe County, that the plaintiff may-have an opportunity to prove his notice, and the defendants to make any defence thereto, which their case, according to law, may admit of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beale v. Wilson, 4 Munf. 380, 18 Va. 380, 1815 Va. LEXIS 19 (Va. 1815).

4 Munf. 380 (Beale v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnsdall v. Boley
119 F. 191 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia, 1902)
Hodgkin v. Holland
34 Ark. 203 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1879)
Paine v. Tutwiler
27 Va. 440 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Goolsby v. Strother
21 Va. 107 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1871)
Ward v. Churn
18 Va. 801 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1868)
Beery v. Homan's
8 Va. 48 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1851)
Skipwith v. Mutual Assurance Society
10 Va. 502 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1839)
Eubank v. Ralls's ex'or
4 Va. 308 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1833)
Ayres v. Lewellin
3 Va. 609 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1832)