B.D.M. v. State

43 So. 3d 958, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14192
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 2010·No. No. 2D09-2111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Two unidentified men towed a car from a carport without the owner’s permission. Thereafter, the victim’s daughter and the daughter’s boyfriend, B.D.M., were charged with grand theft and adjudicated delinquent after separate hearings. This court reversed the daughter’s adjudication because the circumstantial evidence did not exclude a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. M.F. v. State, 35 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). B.D.M.’s adjudication was based on substantially the same circumstantial evidence as that presented against the daughter, and it likewise was insufficient. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

WALLACE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.D.M. v. State, 43 So. 3d 958, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

43 So. 3d 958 (B.D.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BDM v. State
43 So. 3d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)